It did take us a while to upload around 1000 feedback, but we believe it was well worth the effort as the excellent feedback given to us is perhaps the most precious asset we possess!
Which other company can boast of uploading 1000 feedback that testifies the quality of training rendered?
The concepts were made clear and application wise, the small examples dealt with helped a lot. The course material contains quick references on all important concepts and commands - “a very handy material”. Many students are found to be not good at debugging. During lab sections, students must be made to trouble shoot themselves.
- After Perl in 2010Suggestions? Not really. This is the last class so at end all I would like to say is that after all the 3 semesters, I probably am not a good programmer yet, but a year ago I had no clue what programming was, no idea as to what # include <stdio.h> did, but today I am helping juniors, colleagues and basically writing programs. Nagesh Sir got me thinking and put me on a path... Now probably I thrive to code better! Kudos to him, *wow*!
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2014Teaching was really excellent but I feel at times, we should have got more time to get the concept more clearly.
- After Linux & C in 2006Teaching is up to the mark. More than expectation. Little hard to cope up the speed.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching was excellent. Lab assistance was excellent and the trainers were very helpful and supportive too.
- After Linux in 2009Teaching is excellent. We learned so much. Improvements: discuss more examples in the class. I find course material are so compact, helpful in vision. Try to add some more solved examples.
- After Linux & C in 2006Teaching is good but I think one should gave more example to illustrate. But I feel it's the best method how one can teach in such a short term. Lab assistance is good, faculty is quite interactive.
- After Java in 2006Teaching is very good. Course material is good and self-explanatory. Lab assistance is good.
- After Perl in 2006Teaching was very good. Few of the things i learnt was very good, great assistance when needed.
- After C & C++ in 2008Classroom session was good and all doubts were clarified in the class itself. Material is descriptive and easy to read. Project assigned to each student, a good thing to implement to give hands on training.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Very informative. Dwelt on the basics cleared a lot of doubts and 'myths' about C/C++. We knew how to do it but not Why. Since the teaching was very good course material went unnoticed but will be helpful for reference. Lab assistance was excellent. Assignments were sometimes overwhelming but certainly not unachievable. I will remember all the examples (analogies) to the real world when I come across it in my work. May be it'll make my job less boring.
- After C & C++ in 2008This was a fantastic experience to me. I did not know what is computer language. But after teaching, I know better than other institute students. Lab assistance was excellent. They helped whatever our doubts very patiently.
- After Linux & C in 2006The classroom teaching is excellent if Nagesh Sir is teaching. No doubt in this.
- After Java in 2006Dear Sir, you are the best teacher as far as teaching comp. sc. is concerned. I could touch computer and do something on it and only that is possible because of you. Thank you very much Sir. You can be a bit slower. Sir, please do teach Perl and Java for us. Please do send monthly assignments for us to work (once in a month only).
- After Linux & C in 2005It was very good. The style in which it was taught we are able to do coding by ourself today. In lab we were allowed to solve problems by ourself were we exposed to lots of learning, complex error were solved.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Your method of teaching is very good. It would be even better if you can give more examples on functions, pointers, arrays, recursion. Addition of problems related to biological computing will be an added benefit.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching was superb, I have cleared almost all my doubts. Course material is very good, in a very simple language. One or two blank pages can be added after every chapter so that the student can make notes.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching was wonderful during the complete term of the course. All the basics were touched upon & every query was answered with good answers. The knowledge and skill level of the teacher was excellent.
- After Linux & C in 2003The teaching was excellent. With regards to improvements, all I can think of is if we were given more varied programs to work out in the lab. Keep up the brilliant work!
- After Linux & C in 2006Perfect blend of theory with practical. Good number of examples were covered with hands on training.
- After C++ in 2014Teaching is really excellent as it goes in a very systematic way which makes it easy to understand. Assistance is good it helps us to clarify our doubts.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Teaching was really good. Whenever there was a linux class I used to rush to classroom. Very interesting. Nothing to improve. It was the finest I have attended so far about an operating system.
- After Linux in 2009Time duration to each a language is very very less, but overall (only 3 classes) enjoyed the classes, both Nagesh sir and satya sir classes were good. Course material was quite useful, compressed and simpler.
- After Perl in 2010The teaching imparted is excellent. The course material provided is also very good, it has scope for elaboration though. The lab assistance is excellent, but there must be some more lab sessions interspersed through the week.
- After Linux & C in 2006The Teaching is really good. Course material can be easily understood and good.
- After C & C++ in 2011Teaching was excellent. After this course, I am feeling more professional than before. I got more confidence in me.
- After Linux & C in 2006Nagesh Sir should come everyday if possible. Would like more material on Linux across various vendors. Lab assistance was good, sufficient in nature.
- After Linux in 2011The teaching is very well done as everyone can understand and learn no matter of how much computer experience they have. The course material contains everything that we need to know and very informative. Lab assistance is very helpful as it rectifies one problem immediately and ensures we are on the right path.
- After Linux in 2012The teaching by Nagesh sir was very good though the speed is too much at times. As far as the assistance in lab, Satya sir's explanation was great.
- After Linux in 2009Teaching is very nice
- After Perl in 2010Teaching is great!!. Concepts are very clear. Whatever I know in C/C++ today its coz of you Sir. Course material is concise and easy to recollect. Letting us think before giving out the actual implementations, it was the best part about lab assistance. Thank you sir.
- After C & C++ in 2008Gave a better perspective of Java especially with those real life examples. Good guidance for “Java Swing”, could implement the same for the early classes of Java, for ease of understanding.
- After Java in 2013Demo classes are really helpful. It provides confidence and idea about writing program.
- After C++ in 2012The teaching is very conceptual and good. The material is good &andinformative and is best utilized if classes are attended regularly & sincerely.
- After Linux & C in 2004The teaching was excellent with respect to the flow, clarifications, explaining concepts and also giving enough hands on practice.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching is perfect, well-informed, extremely clear cut examples, good rapport with students and a sense of direction and purpose for each lecture. Course material is well prepared, synchronized well with the classes. more examples and a little more of explanation would be preferred. Continue forming bonds with students, sharing personal experiences which provide a lot of insight to the students.
- After Linux & C in 2003Please give me project or include in your project so that I can learn more. Classroom teaching is Very Good. Thank you.
- After C++ in 2012We enjoy projects. Hope we get some more projects.
- After Java in 2012Nagesh Sir teaches well. No problems at all. In short Nagesh Sir *always rocks*. Due to clear words I am able to understand to the point. Words are appropriate is very good point. Please continue that. Thank you for being our Teacher.
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2012The teaching was really good. I think it won't be a bad idea to increase the no. of days so that we can learn more.
- After Linux in 2007The way of teaching is excellent and lots of concept were cleared after the completion of this training.
- After Linux in 2012Way of teaching is very good. Sufficient examples were shown.
- After Advanced Linux in 2012The teaching given by you is really upto the mark. I was blank in anything related to computers, but after your teaching classes, I must admit that I know “something” rather than “nothing”. The written language in the course material is very simple and easily understandable. It's a best course material for any beginner. You should be teaching us other languages also. I must say please to come again and teach us in 2nd semester also.
- After Linux & C in 2005The explanation given for any questions are nice. The flow of talk is very good and understandable. But sometimes the speed of teaching is fast, so that it becomes difficult to hold all the things. The lab assistance provided is really helpful. In case of even a little doubt, they come and explain it nicely.
- After Perl in 2005The teaching provided was really best. I think no one else can teach better than this.
- After Java in 2005Teaching was good. The way of explaining the concepts were good. Sense of humour was also good.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007It was great learning computers from Nagesh Sir. Whatever came out of your mouth was not missing my ears (I mean, you created so much of interest in me for your course). Your patience and persistence are inspirational Sir!
- After Linux & C in 2006Teaching was good. No improvements suggested. Lab assistance was good. It was very comfortable learning Perl (in all respects). So, no further suggestions! Keep it up!
- After Perl in 2006I liked the way you teach. I always believe understanding will not be complete without knowing the background. You managed to make us understand why and what happens in the 'blind dumb box' when intelligence plays around. Your course material was good. I think it gave good idea and insight on the subjects.
- After Linux & C in 2003Remain as you are. You are just excellent. I learned many things from you. I can say, when there is less time, don't go very fast. You're an idol teacher for me. Above all, you raise my interest in C. At the end, I can say that I like Linux like anything.
- After Linux & C in 2004Very nice, in fact, strictly speaking no one can be better than you as long as you don't teach very fast. I can't keep pace with you sometimes when you teach very fast. Very good lab session b'coz it never given any chance to sleep after lunch. Its too informative course material as it contains comparative statements. It provides many examples, but not in good sufficient amount. Provide some more lectures specially on PERL & JAVA. Please never leave IBAB
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching flow was very nice. You kept us involved in the class and lab as well.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007The teaching was very good, conceptual learning . We have learnt two languages in a short span of time. The material's quality is excellent and everything is to the point. Space must provided for making our notes in the course material itself. Everyone's doubts were cleared at that point only in the lab.
- After Perl in 2010It was really in the literal sense excellent. I learnt C before & Linux was new to me, but I got really a new perspective of the entire thing. Really enjoyed Tuesdays and Thursdays (days of your classes). The days after the end of which I really felt that I got 100% out of it.
- After Linux & C in 2006Never underwent such classes, really Nagesh Sir's classes are an asset forever. Thank you for all your help & support, for opening a completely new window to view what programming is and how an ideal teacher should be.
- After Perl in 2006The teaching methodology is great. The small sessions should be taken everyday. The course material is compact, and reliable and I don' t think there is a need of improvement. The lab assistance provided is excellent, not much improvements.
- After Linux in 2011No suggestions. You are a great teacher. On our last class I want to tell you this. Always keep it up. Keep enlightening the life of other students.
- After Java in 2012Teaching by Nagesh sir is very good for starters like me as it helps us in understanding the concepts clearly. Its much better compared to other coaching centres. Lab assistance is good. They attend us with patience. I like the assistance provided by Amsaraj sir to others.
- After Java in 2006Teaching was excellent. For the first time I come across such a teaching person who has command in his voice and has power to motivate all and keep all the students very active. Course material: for a beginner it is very good. It provides depth theory of all aspects of Linux and C.
- After Linux & C in 2005The way teaching was organized is good. Most of the doubts are also cleared. Technical concepts are explained in a simple manner with real-time examples. Course material is well designed, which helps in recalling things that is taught in class.
- After Java in 2003-2006Teaching is good. I liked the classes learnt more about programming languages. Project idea was good gave more idea to know the subject.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Excellent teaching. Using real life examples in class really helped. Thank you for making computers and programming languages seem much easier and interesting than I felt a year back.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Very friendly environment and in depth teaching. Comparing what we learned and what other language equivalent and its just tempting to have one more course. Questions asked in the class on very simple but tricky is very very appreciable. Marvelous!
- After Linux & C in 2003Ya, it was very good & enlightening. Knew many of the basics, strongly & clearly now.
- After Java in 2003-2006NO IMPROVEMENTS. Absolutely perfect. A million thanks to give impositions not to forget 'morning question session'. I would be glad if you take our Perl classes too. Wish to see you again in 2nd semester.
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching was very good. It was made simpler, hence difficult concepts were also explained in a very simple way. It was really good. No improvement required.
- After Java in 2005Teaching is good
- After Java in 2008Teaching was good. Material is point to point and has very good information.
- After Linux in 2008Teaching was perfectly fine. Concepts were made clear in the class. Especially the revision part by asking question plus the fine was the good way to keep us involved in the subject. Overall it was good.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007All teachers are very nice especially Nagesh Sir is the best teacher I have ever seen. Only imrovement possible is time managment in class i.e more practical session without evaluation. Linux course material is very good.
- After Linux in 2009This is not related to the course, please never change your way of teaching. I thought programing is tough, but after listening your classes I felt I can also do something in this field. Thanks for that.
- After Linux & C in 2003Without exagerrating, I would like to say it was too good, before also I have undergone C training but couldn't build the concepts. Now I'm better than what I was. As per improvements, if you'll go a bit slow it will be easier and we'll grasp much. The course material is good, precise and to the point. Good for quick reference. No suggestions as such. I would like to see CyberPlus growing day by day. Confidence of teaching students is the best part I liked about it.
- After Linux & C in 2006It was really good but we should have spent more time for Java, the way we did for C (I know it was not possible as Perl was due). It was little too fast. Java course is really interesting and teaching strategy is also good like classroom teaching followed by lab assignment. I think this is the best way one can teach in a short span of time.
- After Java in 2006Teaching was very good. The explanations and examples cited are excellent. We were able to relate to the basics and feel confident about whatever little we have learnt. Please take our Perl and Java classes also.
- After Linux & C in 2005The methodical way of building up of logic is really good. I have not found any teacher explaining logic better.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching was very nice. We were able to understand very well.
- After Linux in 2011Teaching was thorough and i was able to understand the basics of all concepts discussed.
- After C & C++ in 2011Its awesome
- After C in 2013Teaching is good. I am satisfied though it is fast.
- After Java in 2013Teaching is good, we should have more classes for the completion of assigned syllabus.
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2014One of the best thing in my life. You have been great, informative, interesting... please try to teach more bio informatics related stuff, prog etc. You can just give to students so that they can work.
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching was excellent and perfect. I have never studied computers before but after these classes I can say I know computers. These are the best classes I have attended. Thank you Sir. Course material is very good reference material; nice for quick revision. Sir please come for our Perl classes.
- After Linux & C in 2005It was really good. Initially I didn't like the language (JAVA) but now i can clearly see the advantages of JAVA over Perl.
- After Java in 2005Very good, presentation style, way of tackling the questions. Could have been more hands on.
- After Java in 2011Flow of teaching is excellent. The question session at the beginning of every class is excellent. Lab assistance was good and the concept of project is great. Nagesh Sir converted me a non- computer student to a computer. He is just like “Neptune” God of OOP.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Sir, your teaching is excellent. I was illiterate about computers when I joined this course. Just because my curiosity in computers. That is all because of you. So thank you for being our teacher.
- After Linux & C in 2005The teaching was excellent. Though i had C in my under graduation,I had never understood it. I was afraid of C. Now after this course I have the confidence that I can do C. As far as improvements in teaching may be only the timespan should increase(spreadover). Rest no problem.
- After Linux & C in 2005The teaching was excellent. The paradigm was thought in a very different, clear way (not found in any text book I have read). Thank You. Thank you for giving a good insight into all concepts and application of C and C++. Hope to have a training on advanced C++ later on too.
- After C & C++ in 2003-2006Presentation of every concept was very clear along with appropriate illustrations. The assignments helped apply our knowledge .The sessions were very interactive .It would have probably been more helpful,if these were 1 or 2 tests just as an assessment of how we have retained. Course material is well organized, found this material better than the C/C++. The training was very useful .The approach towards OOP in C++ was strengthened in this course. The constant emphasis in this differences b/w C++ and Java helped me not to forget C++.
- After Java in 2003-2006Teaching was really very good. No as such improvements are needed. It was excellently organized and every intricacy in C and Linux is taught as much as it is possible and real excellent job. Course materials were not as excellent as the teaching was. Basically, the user friendliness can be improved very much. Examples, more explanations on concepts. I really felt good of the training I got in C so expect Nagesh Sir to come and train on other computer concepts in 2nd sem also.
- After Linux & C in 2005The teaching was really excellent especially the question answer round helped us a lot. Course material is very good.
- After Linux in 2012I sincerely feel that course could not have been any better. Its as good as it can get.
- After Linux in 2012The teaching was really good, all the pros and cons on each topic were dealt with, as it was taught by a skilled person. Improvements like concentrating or allotting more time for subject for a particular period time can make the learning easier, like dealing only with C or Linux till the end.
- After Linux & C in 2003The teaching was great interactive and more focussed on application of the linux. Now operating with Linux is fun!
- After Linux in 2012Teaching is good and he starts from the basics and Sir explains the reason behind everything.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Awesome teaching by Nagesh Sir. All doubts cleared in class itself. All the points are covered in the course material with solved and unsolved questions in large numbers. Lab assistance: Very helpful and patient but instead of giving the code directly when similar problems encountered by all, the approach to the code should be told i.e. the logic behind it.
- After C in 2013Teaching is very good. Concepts clear about HTML, SQL, XML, CGI Perl
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2014Nagesh sir no doubt is the best. Never had a teacher like him. It's due to him I have fallen in love with Linux
- After Linux in 2009You are a GOLDSMITH. I never knew I could understand computer. You made me do so. I am positive there is even no single corner for improvement. Salutes to you. Most certainly you are very supportive & friendly, very rarely do we encounter such teachers.
- After Linux in 2012Nagesh Sir taught very well using simple concepts and easy to understand examples.
- After C & C++ in 2011Time and effort put by the teacher is great. However as a student I need to put in a while more. Lab sessions are highly interactive and teachers help out really nicely.
- After Linux in 2014The teaching was very precise and unambiguous. The classes were very structured and helped build relations between them. Lab sessions are one of the most interactive and informative part of the course.
- After C in 2014The teaching was appropriate for the course we have. The concepts were cleared and classes made Java relatively easy. The course material provided fulfilled the basic requirements and also made it easy to relate to the previous knowledge of C & C++ concepts. Aditya sir was very interactive during the lab sessions
- After Java in 2015Teaching was very good. Grep portions did not have enough examples. Practise lab sessions were really good. All help was rendered.
- After Linux in 2009Teaching was very good. Everything was explained very patiently. Satya sir was very good. Lab assistance was good.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching with practical and real world examples is awesome. C++ concepts were very well presented.
- After C & C++ in 2008Teaching methods are good. For just 6 classes, this much detailed book has been wonderful. I like the way it has designed, especially contents are detailed for quick reference. Manoj sir, Murugan sir, Amsarajan sir all did their job very well. I won't ask questions in the lab, they have explained me topics from the basic and to my level of understanding. Very good.
- After Perl in 2006Way of teaching is excellent. Specially, Linux part. C part was also excellent, but we need programming practice.
- After Linux & C in 2005Though I had a paper in 'C' in my 1st year B.Tech biotechnology course, I couldn't get a base on C. After the course, though I'm not an expert, I'm sure I've got a good base. I found the classroom teaching better than the course material in the case of C. The linux course material is good. The lab assistance is also good but they should spend some time with students to explain it since everybody need not have the same grasping power.
- After Linux & C in 2006Undergoing the C course was professional, concepts were coherent. Course material is useful after classroom coaching. It would be very useful if the concepts taught are explained with all examples (as taught in class). Lab assistance is excellent. Concepts and implementation are bridged, which is quite very good. Roopa madam is excellent as she gives more ideas than asked for. Thank you very much.
- After C in 2013Teaching is excellent as always. In terms of student prospects it would be highly beneficial if the previous concepts are revisited for few minutes. Java project practice helped us revisit the concepts and was or good experience . I am thankful for the insights provided during lab sessions.
- After Java in 2013Teaching is really excellent. I didn't know anything about any language of computer but now I am learning something about computer. Whatever lab assistance has been provided is really excellent. I have cleared my fundamental doubts and also very silly things about computers. Entirely, the computer course is very good. But still, we need to be taught a bit more on basics of computer hardware.
- After Linux & C in 2006Everything is great so nothing to write(suggest). I learned the computer course which is great thing for me.
- After Perl in 2006No improvements, my complements for Satya sir. Please provide as many classes possible for each course, because this is the first time we are being introduced to technical languages.
- After Perl in 2010Wats Up !!!, It was a beautiful experience to learn and code with you. Thank you so much Sir. Remember us.
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2012Presentation skills & explaining the concepts is very good. Like to have more hands on in the class so prepare some small assignments which can be done in the class. It is a very good course material. At the end of the course material suggest some good books, and websites which can be used for additional info.
- After C & C++ in 2003-2006Teaching and coverage was excellent. The way you have explained basic concepts is too good.
- After Java in 2003-2006Teaching and presentation is very good.
- After Advanced Linux in 2003-2006Teaching by Nagesh Sir is tuly very good. Specific precise & understandable way of teaching.
- After C in 2013Teaching is very good, but there has to be more practical classes, so that we can practice.
- After Java in 2013Keep going in the same way fantastic teaching. Please include some more examples in the course material and it'll be fine. Lab assistance is fantastic. No suggestion but we definitely miss your teaching.
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2014Teaching is very good. Explanations were given very clearly. Question & Answer rounds were good.
- After Linux & C in 2004The teaching was very good. I have developed a genuine interest in programming after having been taught by this set of teachers. I just wish that this was a longer duration course so we gained a better understanding especially for students like me who had no inclination/interest in this field. But I thank you very much for generating interest in me. I hope you will be able to solve my problems regarding C.
- After Linux & C in 2006Teaching was very good, as i have no prior knowledge of computer language, But same class for whole day could be revised! There could be some note making space made available in the course material. Other than that its very good.
- After Linux in 2011The overall training session was very planned and helpful. The presentation and hands on were done in a very good way. Best wishes.
- After Java in 2007The overall training session was very good and very helpful. Really we had a great time, enjoyed learning and the most important aspect was that the interest was created in a very good manner.
- After Linux in 2007Training was excellent. Lot of clarity. But would suggest to reduce the speed of teaching. Course material is pretty explanatory.
- After Linux in 2009Satya Sir is very approachable as always. He tries his best to explain everything we ask.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching was interactive with a stress on fundamentals & logical reasoning. Course material is thorough & descriptive.
- After Linux & C in 2004It was very good. But sometimes it was very fast to catch up specially after 3 hours continuous classes. Please teach us Perl if possible. Lab session was also good but we want some more lab session. Sir, please come back in our 2nd semester.
- After Linux & C in 2005Excellent. I was not known about any computer language before the course but after the course, exactly due to the excellent teaching which clear my ideas, I feel well in that languages. It covers many things in short and clear the idea about that points.
- After Linux & C in 2006It was really excellent. I got clear ideas about the theory and a lot knowledge. They solve all problems to which we face in lab.
- After Java in 2006It's excellent. Lab assistance give good guidance on the problems faced during practical session.
- After Perl in 2006Teaching is really good. I was wondering, how can a person stand for 8 hours (9 to 5) on the first day. It could have been more better if intensity/frequency of the words would be little less. But overall teaching is really really good. No comparison with other institutes. I think, lab assistance is very good. It could have been even more excellent if more lab assistants are provided.
- After Linux & C in 2006Sir, I think no one would have been enough patient than you to clear all our silly doubts. I think classroom teaching is really excellent except the frequency of flow of words should be low.
- After Java in 2006Teaching is good, clear, attentive, interesting. Please please please!!! Do need class on Java, Perl. You are Great!
- After Linux & C in 2005Mr. Nagesh is Neptune! (God of C)! I think CyberPlus must introduce Perl for students too. Teaching is effective as concepts introduced are clear and examples are strong for students. Cyberplus must teach Perl and perhaps advanced C as an additional module. I think it is relevant and beneficial to bio-informatics & system management.
- After Linux & C in 2003Teaching was excellent and to the best effort. The concept fundamentals one could impart to a novice in computers was very clear.
- After Linux & C in 2004The teaching was really good. It was the first time where we got our concepts right in one go.
- After C in 2008The teaching was really good – first time computers was not a dry subject for a biologist.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching is excellent. The examples given are good and small, small issues are dealt very carefully. The teaching made sure that the concepts enter the student mind. All doubts have answered and cleared. Improvement as such i'll say it was perfect and I would like to join for some other advance course at Cyberplus. At no point in the class i felt bored, it was a very lively, interactive and enthusiastic teaching. Course material is precise and well prepared. Just reading it after every class helped me to recollect what has been taught. The examples given here are helpful &so the exercises. You can add some more concepts and extra examples.
- After Linux & C in 2003The teaching was excellent truly enjoyed every bit of it. As for improvements it is just perfect. Material was good.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Actually, there's no problem in teaching, because our doubts of queries are satisfied in the class itself, but complete theory leactures for whole day is too much because we need to coverup all the practicals at a time. Lab assistance was really good. All my practical doubts were solved properly.
- After Perl in 2010May be because of time constraint, the speed seemed to be on faster side, but all in all was great.
- After Linux & C in 2004I liked your approach of teaching. It was very systematic and your way of explaining everything in detail was very good. It did make me develop an interest in computer programing so I'm happy with the course.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching is very good Sir. I dont think you should make any improvements. I don't depend on course material much. If we read the class notes and listen the lecture carefully it will be enough.
- After Linux in 2012Excellent clarity in explanation of topics; ONCE IN A LIFETIME EXPERIENCE. Lab session was very nice; sometimes very difficult programs were given; Very nice team from CyberPlus to guide. Sir, you were little fast in pointers. It would have been better if you could have demonstrated some programs for better understanding. Everything else was Excellent.
- After Linux & C in 2005Well I found the way of teaching is very good. One can learn much from this. Teacher has covered almost all the topics in a quite excellent way in 5 days.
- After Java in 2012Teaching is best. No improvements required. Course material provided is very good. It helps us in gaining knowledge
- After Linux in 2012The knowledge of the trainer is very good. The teaching still is good.
- After Advanced Linux in 2003-2006Methodology was too good. A logical subject has been taught in a logical way. For a beginner like me, the course material is excellent. Since everything is touched, for revision also it is quite good.
- After Linux & C in 2003Teaching was very informative and quite helpful. Theory & practical both were useful. Course material is very helpful for referring the concepts in future.
- After Linux in 2009Teaching is best. I could understand the clear concepts of Linux. I knew Linux before but now I could understand the process behind it. The lab assistance is good, we could practice and clear the doubts easily.
- After Linux in 2012I think now I am more comfortable with programming; it is because of all your efforts. Course material is very good but in that some more examples of the program should be included. All the teachers help us out their best, so I am very thankful and respect for them and their helps.
- After Linux in 2009Due to the time constraint Nagesh Sir didn't come for C as well as for Perl, if he comes it will be more beneficial for us. But Satya sir did very well in the absence of the Nagesh sir. Satya sir and Vinod sir are very helpful during the lab sessions, Ganapathi sir came only one day during Perl, so missing them.
- After Perl in 2010It was great. Linux was really good and I suppose we got great knowledge in that short period.
- After Linux in 2009Teaching was too good. I think I have become quite comfortable in Linux. This is all because of excellent teaching. Computers has been taught in such an understandable way that it would be helpful through out the life. I had never thought that it would be helpful through out the life. I had never thought that computers will be taught starting from the basics level inspite of events present in the class. According to me the course material was quite good - what was taught in the class was present in the material.
- After Linux in 2009Perl is in much better conditions as compared to the start and end of C. I hope you understood Satya sir was very nice and much better. But Nagesh sir no one like you. Some are very good in both sense - knowledge and nature. Vinod sir was very good and very helpful. Sir but please try not to send new people we are comfortable with the old ones. Whenever you send new people we take time to adjust and during practices sessions we don't have that much time.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching is so good. For my B.Tech, I had C, but I learned so many things when I came here. I could understand from the basics. Course material is good. From that, I could study commands very easily. In the course material, you can have more worked out programs. Lab assistance is good. I got the help whenever I needed.
- After Linux & C in 2006It was really good.
- After Perl in 2006Emphasis on definitions was good. Concepts were presented in a logical way. Challenges stimulated us to think well. This course removed my apprehensions about C++ and has prepared me for my project. Thanks to CyberPlus.
- After C & C++ in 2007Classroom training is good, some more illustrations are needed in course materials, Some more hands on experience required.
- After Linux in 2007I found the way of teaching very nice. It solved my doubts. I learned languages first time and did not feel like I am learning. Course material is very nice, all matters are given point to point, but please give a blank page on the left side, it is easy to make notes. Vinod sir did a good job but one more faculty should be here because it is very tiring for sir & students both.
- After Perl in 2010The teaching was very good. The course material is very precise. The lab assistance provided is very good. Please come for second semester. We'll wait.
- After Linux & C in 2006I found the teaching good. No need of any improvement
- After Java in 2006I found the teaching methodology excellent. Can't suggest any improvement now, as for now, I have to improve a lot. Lab assistance was very good. More time in class should be given so that we can improve our logical and programming skills.
- After Linux & C in 2006Teaching was very good because you started with basics assuming that we dont know much and you went in depth regarding each and every concepts. Most of the myths got cleared by the end of the course. Programs were interesting and you could have given more of them.
- After C & C++ in 2008Teaching was of the best I had ever attended. The examples given were good. Lab assistance was very good.
- After C & C++ in 2008The teaching was very effective. Each and every aspects were emphasized in a way which wants us to learn more about the subject. We, would like to know more about Linux. Thank You Sir.
- After Linux in 2011Teaching was excellent. More classes would have helped us to understand better.
- After Java in 2012No comments on teaching. Much better than I can expect. Lab session is ok. Please teach us PERL & JAVA class.
- After Linux & C in 2005The teaching here has been excellent. I came here not knowing a zip about computers, now I feel I can converse with my younger brother who is a project manager. Thank you Nagesh Sir. Sir, please have a few classes on Perl. Lab session have been a learning experience. We practiced everything that was taught in class under the keen scrutinizing eyes of Nagesh Sir & his staff members. I'll be honest & say I used to jot down everything that was taught in class and just go through it I found it more informative than the course material. Improvements: How can you improve upon perfection?
- After Linux & C in 2005Satya Sir's teaching was really good. Lab assistance was really good, every person was given a lot of attention.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching was very wonderful and it was very much fun to learn with a light environment in class. No improvements required. Its all superb. The Lab sessions was good as he made us think on ourself to solve some problems. Overall the classes were great and it will be more good if Nagesh Sir will take our other programming classes as well.
- After Linux in 2012The classes were very interesting.
- After Linux in 2009Thank you Sir! File handling was very nice. Well understood. Well practiced (Had enough questions for practice).
- After Perl in 2010The way of teaching is appreciable, going to the basics and deep in the subject without complicating is really good. I'll suggest that it can be improved through project planning for what time to be taken by which part, as in beginning we were slow and then we did things with a little hurry. So, I think this is to be given a thought.
- After Linux & C in 2003From my view the teaching was excellent and as I am from bio background, I felt very much comfortable with programming and still learning more which concept I got from good teaching.
- After Linux & C in 2004Excellent teaching. Thus, I can't suggest any further improvements. The material consists of everything, but it should contain much more examples.
- After Linux & C in 2006Unique, nice and understandable. Course material is very useful & handy; gives basic information which is essential to building a strong foundation in the subject.
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching was undoubtedly very good. But i feel it could have been slower.
- After Java in 2006The coaching was good enough. I personally liked the material - I feel it is informative enough. Lab assistance has aiways been good. Sometimes, teachers stay back after class hours also to help us out.
- After Perl in 2006The ideas given during training is really awesome. Seriously wondering how you get those ideas so fast.
- After Java in 2011No comments on the quality and the way of teaching, for commenting would lead to undermining of the effort Sir took to help we people understand computers & the languages. The course material is very compact. I liked the phrase in them “if you follow the classes and then go through the course material, you need not read any other books”. Great job Sir! Keep the good spirit going.
- After Linux & C in 2004Outstanding.
- After Linux in 2009Nice teaching, my appreciation to Satya sir. The course material is good, really good.
- After Perl in 2010Teaching was excellent. All the concepts were made clear and everything. Had no problems.
- After Linux & C in 2004I really find the way of teaching very good. The way you make the whole class active and involved is just praise-worthy.
- After Linux & C in 2003Teaching was effective. The examples given made the understanding better.
- After Linux in 2011The teaching was effective. The examples given for every topic made the understanding better.
- After C & C++ in 2011This session was the best amongst all the session. I feel I have learnt a lot.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007Teaching was really nice. Not only many concepts are clear but also there is enhanced interest in the subject which is very important for the students of non-computer background. Lab sessions were really helpful. Instructors were very friendly and explained the things very nicely. Thanks for co operation. Course material is good. Little more explanation is required.
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching was quite comprehensive,focused and well organised. Course material is nicely structured. Lab assistance was very supportive.
- After Java in 2005All the examples rendered made me understand the whole subject very well. More than the material we concentrated on the lectures and we found them to be enough. Lab assistance was proper and well managed.
- After HTML, SQL, CGI & XML in 2012Teaching was superb. We grasped everything(even being a non-computer background person). Lab assistance was fantastic. But I feel more time must be given for lab session since in the prescribed schedule, it is quite tough to finish all. Course material is very precise and to the point. Advanced topics in C like stacks/queries/binary trees etc. and some websites to take up online tests may be provided. It was fun to be in the class. Thank you Sir.
- After Linux & C in 2005Interesting... I never thought I could learn programming language. But at the end I feel as if its easy.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching was excellent. The way you explain everything are very good but one thing you should have control in your speed because it takes time for a student who learns computers for the first time.
- After Linux & C in 2004I liked it as the theory is always linked to a story. The lab assistance help us a lot and make us understand till we are satisfied to their answers.
- After Linux & C in 2006The pace of teaching should get a bit slow. Explanation and way of expression is crystal clear. There is ample opportunity to ask doubts.
- After Linux & C in 2005I am not technically qualified enough to comment on his improvements, even though lectures were extensively theory-based but crisp, clear & interactive. Lab assistance was good. Focus was more on explaining their implementation rather than providing insights through each student's design.
- After C++ in 2009The way Nagesh Sir teaches is excellent and I think there is no improvement required.
- After Linux & C in 2005Teaching was very professional and the best way one can teach. Perhaps the most effective verbose communication which was very effective.
- After C & C++ in 2008The teacher was very good in communicating his ideas across to students. His knowledge in depth, about the subject was very obvious. I can think of no improvement that can be made.
- After Linux & C in 2003Teaching is good. Nothing is to be improved. Anyways there are slow learners and they take time to be fine polished. That doesn't mean that course was by any means bad.
- After Linux & C in 2004Teaching was 'par' excellence. It made all concepts clear. I have never encountered a better method. Thank you Sir for making at least me somewhat comfortable to C. The course material is very explicit about the topics. It gives a clear & thorough understanding of the subject.
- After Linux & C in 2004In my opinion the classroom session was the best. I think Sir tried his best to solve the problem of each and every student.
- After C++, MySQL, CGI, Java in 2007